On Apr 5, 2001, Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to add that all KDE libraries are labeled with
> -no-undefined, so there should be no guessing involved. So if you
> see a -lb you can be sure all references to it are resolved if you
> put the given LIBADDs of liba behind it. Perhaps this -no-undefined
> should be part of the .la file?
This would be a good idea, if it were not for the fact that
-no-undefined means the library *plus its dependencies* have no
references to external symbols, not the library by itself. So we
still don't have much freedom to drop or move -lname flags around :-(
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
