On Apr 18, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> However, I still think we might want to revert to the 2 year old
> relatively complaint free (but marginally error-prone) duplicate
> removal for the release of 1.4.

Yeah, I'm all for it.  When I thought it was a bad thing, I hadn't
realized it used a carefully-chosen heuristics to decide when certain
duplicates couldn't be removed.  Now that I know that, I agree it's
right to leave the duplicate-removal code enabled.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to