On Saturday 21 April 2001 11:20 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether the compilation error is valid, but this system has
> a pretty pedantic C99 compiler. Here's a patch:
>
> 2001-04-21 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * libltdl/ltdl.c (trim): Don't inline. Unixware 7.1.1's compiler
> says you can't access static variables from inline functions.
>
> *** libltdl/ltdl.c.orig Sat Apr 21 15:35:56 2001
> --- libltdl/ltdl.c Sat Apr 21 15:39:12 2001
> ***************
> *** 1943,1949 ****
> return errors;
> }
>
> ! static inline int
> trim (dest, str)
> char **dest;
> const char *str;
> --- 1943,1949 ----
> return errors;
> }
>
> ! static int
> trim (dest, str)
> char **dest;
> const char *str;
I must say that my spidey-sense tells me that `static inline' is a GNU
extension... if I am right we should reduce all static inline's to static
anyhow.
Okay to commit (with or without additional inline keyword removal)?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
