Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_libs

[Martin Baulig]

Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> That's why I wrote *explicitly*.  You shouldn't get -lm duplicated in
> this case.  If you do, it's a bug.  You should only get it duplicated
> if it appeared more than once in the dependence list of liba.la or
> libb.la; if it appears only once it both of them, only the last one
> should prevail.

Well, that's what didn't work for me. I'll debug it later on.

-- 
Martin Baulig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (private)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)

_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool