On Feb 7, 2002, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then why wasn't this done explicitly in the first place? Why is there an > incomplete test for architectures != arm when it is much more robust to > make a single check for arm?
Because for unlisted architectures, the status was unknown, so libtool took the conservative approach of assuming that linking static libraries into shared libraries didn't always work. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
