Max Bowsher wrote:
> Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
>>Guido Draheim wrote:
>>
>>>hmm, perhaps, the LD can now link with dlls directly, and that should
>>
>>Yes, indeed it can, and will search for it in the LIBRARY_PATH. If it
>>can't find libfoo.dll.a or libfoo.a it will look for libfoo.dll when
>>-lfoo is given.
>
>
> Unfortunately, libtool doesn't know about this (I don't think), and will not
> pass -l options to the compiler, preferring to resolve them to files itself.
>
which can be changed... and should be when known that the compiler will
handle all the linking steps alone. But... (next post)...
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
