Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If people consider we deliberatedly broken bugward compatibility, then > fine, you're free to be wrong. It's not what happened (and I can tell > you that a lot of code would not have been written if that was our > intention), but I don't care what people think wrt this now, because...
For what it's worth, I don't think you deliberately broke it, and I'm not arguing intentions at all. I'm just trying to relate how it looks from entirely outside the project, when the only information one has to go on is how Autoconf 2.13 works and how Autoconf 2.54 works. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
