Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > The MinGW patch uses lib<base>-<number>.dll for DLL naming, otherwise > the naming is the same as Cygwin. Cool. I'm happy. > This problem has already been anticipated and addressed. Good to know. > The patch looks for an existing Cygwin installation and tries to > overwrite any existing DLL files. Just kidding. :-) Lovely! Sounds perfect. --Chuck _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
- Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Max Bowsher
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Max Bowsher
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Charles Wilson
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: Proposed libtool patch f... Max Bowsher
- Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: Proposed libtool pat... Earnie Boyd
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Charles Wilson
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Mingw-msys] Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Earnie Boyd
- Re: [Mingw-msys] Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Soren A
- Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW Max Bowsher
