On 11 Oct 2002, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> This patch allowed libMagick++ to compile on my machine.
Great. I'll give it a try tomorrow.
> The one thing that concerns me is the name of the import library is
> hard-coded ${lib}.a, which is okay in that the import library looks
> like "qqq.dll.a" but Max has something going about putting DLLs with
> the executables and the libraries in the library directory during
> install. Is this going to help or hinder Max's work?
I assume that it won't impact his work since his activities would be
taking place during the install step, rather than the compile/link
step.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
