Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Several GNU projects (including GCC) do leave off .0's for anything past the > minor number, so it seems ls -v can't be the final authority :/
It does not follow that this numbering scheme is a good one. I would argue that it isn't. The gcc maintainers seemed to be willing to add .0, but the request didn't come in time for 3.3. paul _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
