-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
| It seems to me that for packages which embed libtool and use libltdl,
| it is very trivial for the package's configure script to also
| configure libltdl. This is *much* more efficient time-wise and
| space-wise than a recursive configure. The fact that the libtool
| package uses a recursive configure sets a bad example that causes
| libltdl to seem like a lot more overhead than it really needs to be.
|
| Should we convert the libltdl configuration to be part of libtool's
| main configure script?
Sure. The libtoolize --ltdl and --ltdl-tar options will need to be reworked
(what exactly is the point of ltdl-tar? Does anybody use it? And if so, why?).
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/wfTKFRMICSmD1gYRAiNSAKCvtVQ5/lC0HU9UACxt2dEjYMLoNgCfX6Xm
HggzrOW2om0N0Eq2YShVpxE=
=QV4H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
