At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:10:14 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So I hope to keep argv[0] for the wrapper, but I have no idea about it > with portability (bash has -a option, but it is not portable).
I made a patch for it. The patch makes a temporary progam to use
execv(3).
Is the patch is acceptable?
--
NOKUBI Takatsugu
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libtool-keep-argv0.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
