* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:19:13PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:20:01PM CET: > >>>>>"Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> Bob> What I have now learned the hard way is that aclocal ignores the > >> Bob> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) definition in configure.ac. > >> > >>IMHO it's a bug in whatever let you think aclocal would honor > >>AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR to way you thought. It certainly isn't the > >>Automake manual. > >> > >>See also > >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00097.html > > > > > > Gary, can we revert libtool--release--2.0--patch-67 or fix it? > > This is a major pain for people when testing branch-2-0. > > The automake-1.4 compatibility patch? Why, what is wrong with it?
Brother. I meant libtool--release--2.0--patch-68. Where's the coffee? Sorry for the noise, Ralf _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool