On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 08:33:41AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Daniel Reed wrote on Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:36:24AM CET: > > Is there any chance .multilib2 can be incorporated into 1.5.12? As written, > > it simply causes libtool to ask gcc to find .la files if gcc is in use. It > > should have no impact on non-gcc builds and should not cause any files to be > > missed (the original behavior is used if gcc is unable to find a requested > > file). > > The general idea looks fine to me. Unless other libtool distro > maintainers disagree, I'd like to see this in branch-1-5 (and then in > branch-2-0 and HEAD as well).
Shouldn't we come up with a more general solution first? Embedding knowledge of a specific compiler in ltmain.sh is wrong. That's what libtool.m4 is for. Is there general consensus of this patch as a model for other platforms (Solaris, Linux with non-GCC compilers, IRIX, etc.)? It seems way too Linux-specific to me. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
