Hi Christian, * Christian Biesinger wrote on Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:22:38AM CEST: > > since GNU ld supports -z defs (or the equivalent --no-undefined), I was > wondering why libtool doesn't use this to enforce its -no-undefined > flag? It does seem to do this on Solaris (and of course on platforms > where that's the only supported behaviour).
IIRC last time I tried it, it caused lots of spurious errors. I don't remember whether they were due to glibc doing weird things, or limitations in the linker. I also don't remember how it interacted with weak symbols. > Or is the issue just that nobody made a patch for this yet? :) Before accepting such a patch, it would need someone to do some testing, on some non-trivial packages, and with a couple of different glibc, gcc, and binutils versions commonly found in use today. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
