On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

Libltdl is a portability library rather than a full-featured
replacement for dlopen() as provided by platform 'X'.

Well, there are arguments for both choices here.  We could look into
allowing choice here in some way.  (No, I don't have a good idea.)

It would be wrong to encourage the development of non-portable applications using libltdl. If someone needs to develop a non-portable application that relies on OS-specific features, they can just use dlopen(). Dlopen() is not difficult to use.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/


_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to