Thanks for all the replies to my question! I'm perfectly content with the fix being in CVS -- it wasn't exactly an urgent problem.
However, the following leaves me a bit curious: On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:04 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > As a workaround (that AFAICS > won't break things in the future) you can put > m4_defun([_LT_AC_LANG_CXX_CONFIG]) > m4_defun([_LT_AC_LANG_F77_CONFIG]) > > in you configure.ac before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL (for which AM_PROG_LIBTOOL is > an older name). I don't know much about how libtool works, but if the compiler checks are so unnecessary that I can just forcibly remove them like that, why were they put in libtool to begin with? Is it some kind of historical leftover? Not that it matters practically -- I'm just curious. Fredrik Tolf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
