* Brendon Costa wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:21:05AM CEST: > > They are both C++ libraries yes. I do not tell either of them to link > with libstdc++ explicitly. The linking lines for the libs are below.
Libtool gets the libstdc++ part in, for g++. > There is no mention of libstdc++ in the linking of libmystatic. There is > however a reference to libstdc++ while linking libmyshared which is > added in by libtool. This should be normal behavior shouldn't it? I guess. I meant: why do you have one static and one shared C++ library? What is the need? I guess I need to dig out whether such a setup is supported by GCC. If it is, then it seems we have a Libtool limitation here. Thanks, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
