* Braden McDaniel wrote on Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:03:04AM CEST: > > In lt__glibc.h, there are symbols HAVE_ARGZ_H and HAVE_WORKING_ARGZ. > Yet, argz.h appears to be included irrespective of them. Is this > intentional? (It's a problem here because there is no argz.h.)
Yes. Libtool provides a replacement argz.h, see libltdl/argz_.h. How come you cannot use a shell environment like MinGW or SFU to build Libtool? You're going to have a pretty rough time emulating the rather involved build logic for it. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
