Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Hi there,
I have a project that builds several libraries. For most of them,
both the shared and static versions make sense, so I don't want
to use AC_DISABLE_STATIC. However, for some of them the static
version does not make any sense. How can I avoid the overhead
of building the static version of those?
Not a direct answer, but have you considered using convenience
libraries for those which should be static, and have default shared?
All the best,
Roberto
_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool