Roberto Bagnara wrote:

Hi there,

I have a project that builds several libraries.  For most of them,
both the shared and static versions make sense, so I don't want
to use AC_DISABLE_STATIC.  However, for some of them the static
version does not make any sense.  How can I avoid the overhead
of building the static version of those?
Not a direct answer, but have you considered using convenience libraries for those which should be static, and have default shared?
All the best,

   Roberto




_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to