Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Roumen Petrov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
But problem is not in the libtool.
Yes it is. If you're linking to libfoo, libtool reads libfoo.la and
adds direct links to everything in dependency_libs. Let's say libfoo
depends on libbar and libbaz. You're application ends up directly
linking to libfoo, libbar and libbaz instead of just libfoo.
No. If project when build a library don't add dependent libraries to
xxx_LIBADD libtool left dependency_libs empty in la-file.
Um, but what if the libraries actually needs to link to other
libraries? Just emptying LIBADD means you're building a broken
library.
"building a broken library" please explain.
I just answer to another mail in this mail thread. You state that all
linux vendor build broken readline library !
Roumen
_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
