On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 23:09, Adam Mercer <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I understanding the versioning correctly, shouldn't there also be a > libFrame.1.0.0.dylib? Is there anything I'm missing, or not > understanding? It appears that I wasn't understanding this correctly as on Darwin it appears that the following versioning is used: compatibility version is 1+CURRENT current version is 1+CURRENT.REVISION install name is 'libfoo.CURRENT-AGE.dylib which matches what I'm seeing. Cheers Adam _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
