Performance depends on a lot of factors (platform, machine, etc). By default, remote-unwinding doesn't enable the cache, so it's certainly relatively slow. I don't think I ever ran into troubles with the 30 sec limit on ia64, but there isn't anything magic about that value either. How big did you have to make the timeout to make it pass? What platform? x86-64?
--david On 3/20/07, Nurdin Premji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the performance of this test, I've found that with the libunwind-20070224 snapshot I had to modify the alarm timeout to make it pass. Is there a problem with the caching of the maps? _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
-- Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/ _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
