On 5/3/07, Andrew Cagney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> I think David still should be the primary reviewer for that. I'd be
> happy to review any x86/x86_64 specific bits.

I look forward to this.


I had started looking at the frysk patches but there are several unrelated
changes and it wasn't always apparent to me why certain changes were made.
I think it would help if the patches were broken up into individual,
"obviously-correct" pieces that are submitted by mail.

 --david
--
Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/
_______________________________________________
Libunwind-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel

Reply via email to