On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - w1 &= 0xffffffff; > - return (w0 == 0x0f0000000fc0c748 && w1 == 0x66666605); > + w1 &= 0xff; > + return (w0 == 0x0f0000000fc0c748 && w1 == 0x05); > Your fix looks right to me. David, please apply. Longer term, we should use dwarf augmentations to match signal frames though. -Arun
_______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
