ext Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The existing search order is the same as that used by other tools > which handle .gnu_debuglink, so I suggest you do not change it.
The original approach was used because it seemed the less intrusive. But I agree with your suggestion to keep compatibility with other tools. > One > options is to reject separate debuginfo files that include a > .gnu_debuglink section. I think we can take this option. > Another would be to use any other naming > convention; Debian uses libc.so.6.debug. This one I don't like very much. It's system specific (IMHO) and maemo (where we tested our implementation) uses "libc.so.6" in the debuglink. Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia (INdT) Manaus - Brazil _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
