On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Mattias Engdegård <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> By the way, why MS_SYNC and not MS_ASYNC? Doesn't it matter at all, on
> any platform, for anonymous memory?
>

MS_ASYNC seems preferable. I can't remember the reasons why I used MS_SYNC
in the first place. I'll go ahead and make this change unless I hear
otherwise from people using non-x86 platforms.

 -Arun
_______________________________________________
Libunwind-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel

Reply via email to