On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:27:08PM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Konstantin Belousov 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > > AC_CHECK_DECLS: Is there is a simpler solution to the problem?
> > We can assume that presence of one of PTRACE_* or PT_* symbol
> > implies presence of all others, as example. I did this that way
> > to possibly aid in portability to other BSD variants/Mac OS X,
> > that could define only part of the PT_* symbols.
> >
> > Or, we can define autoconf macro to simplify configure.in.
> >
> 
> autoconf macro sounds like a good idea.
Done with AC_CHECK_PTRACE_DECL macro.

> 
> >
> > I think the best would be to require libexecinfo on freebsd for test
> > run. It will be noted in documentation, but no check is needed.
> > What is your opinion ?
> >
> >
> Documentation is fine.
Done.

> 
> 
> > >   - Gtest-dyn1.c: FreeBSD doesn't like malloc.h
> > Fixed by checking for malloc.h. On the other hand, is malloc.h needed
> > there at all ?
> >
> 
> Getting rid of malloc.h does't break the Linux build. Lets go with this fix
> for now.
Done.

Attachment: pgpe4isgSHhGi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Libunwind-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel

Reply via email to