Dear Arun Sharma, On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:00:18 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Petazzoni > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -# Don't link against libatomic_ops for now. We don't want libunwind > > -# to depend on libatomic_ops.so. Fortunately, none of the platforms > > -# we care about so far need libatomic_ops.a (everything is done via > > -# inline macros). > > -# > > -# AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) > > + AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) > > I worry that this will break packaging on x86 by forcing a dependency > from libunwind -> libatomicsops.
I've seen in the NEWS file that there used to be an issue with Debian packages on x86. What is the issue exactly? Does it still exist? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
