On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:50 PM, "C. Bergström" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Benefits of cmake related patches seem non-obvious to me. But if you >> rebase the solaris patches to HEAD, happy to review and apply, >> assuming it doesn't break other platforms. > > Other projects are taking the duel build approach and while we can easily > maintain this outside the tree I think it has value for others. > > For example - I'm testing on a platform which out-of-the-box doesn't have > autocrap (early development system), but I can build cmake in 2-5 minutes > and it's working. > > The cmake stuff is the least intrusive and we'd maintain it or at least fix > any reported bugs. Not opposed to having another build system per-se if there is enough interest in Cmake. Who else is interested? I worry that I might see a scons submission right after this :) At least let's make Solaris support and Cmake independent pieces that can be evaluated and merged separately. -Arun _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
