Looks like it was fixed here: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/libunwind-devel/2014-02/msg00001.html
Vladimir On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Arun Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Arun Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I can probably whip up a patch that works, but we'll need to think >> through the performance impact of increasing the size of dwarf_loc_t. >> > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/8453223/ > > -Arun > > ./unwind_repro > --- not in pthread_mutex_lock --- > thread_start(void*) > start_thread > clone > --------------------------------- > --- IN pthread_mutex_lock --- > sig_handler(int) > killpg > __lll_lock_wait > _L_lock_982 > pthread_mutex_lock > thread_start(void*) > start_thread > clone > --------------------------------- > PASS: Full stack was walked. > > _______________________________________________ > Libunwind-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
