I would consider distro to be downstream, but.. we (PathScale) have also tried to get some patches included - AArch64, Power8 and Solaris related. I also think it's time for the project to accept cmake as an option if not default build system. (Feedback welcomed)
David - thanks for pushing for this On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:03 PM, David Abdurachmanov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14 Feb 2016, at 03:46, Arun Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, I'm glad to hear that you're getting better results from >> master. I'm happy to make a 1.2 tar ball in the next few days. > > Linux distributions tend to package tagged software, thus e.g. > Fedora is still at 1.1 + extra patches. > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libunwind.git/tree/libunwind.spec > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libunwind.git/tree/ > > E.g. the whole AArch64 support is as out-of-tree patch. > > I would suggest to review the patches they (and others, e.g. Debian) have. > > I could run test suite on x86_64/CentOS 6 & 7, aarch64/CentOS 7, > ppc64le/Fedora 22 and ppc64/Fedora 22 once you have release candidate. > > david > > _______________________________________________ > Libunwind-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
