On April 19, 2012 03:00:40 PDT, Pete Batard wrote:
> All,
>
> To "celebrate" the 2 year anniversary of the last public release of  
> libusb, which we think is proof enough that libusb is a dead  
> project, even more so as far as the general public is concerned,  
> quite a few of us (Segher, Vitali [before he went to pursue other  
> endeavours], myself, Hans, Ludovic, Xiaofan, Travis, Michael,  
> Nathan, Kusti, Sean...) have decided that we cared enough about  
> users to decide to participate in a fork of libusb.
>
> This fork, called libusbx and crafted as a drop in replacement of  
> the current libusb, contains pretty much all the improvements and  
> bugfixes that one would expect to find in the next libusb release...  
> were it ever to happen, as well as a few other improvements. As you  
> will find out, we have a clear yet ambitious roadmap [1], with a  
> couple releases under our belt already (v1.0.9 was released  
> internally 2 weeks ago and v1.0.10, which can be downloaded from  
> [2], was released this Monday), and we will do our best to deliver,  
> where libusb failed to.
>
> Therefore, if you are tired of the lack of progress/releases from  
> libusb, or from having to deal with a project that doesn't seem to  
> go anywhere, you are very much invited to visit http://libusbx.org,  
> or our SourceForge page at https://sourceforge.net/projects/ 
> libusbx/, to check libusbx out.
>
> As subscribers of libusb-devel, you are also very much welcome to  
> join our own mailing list (libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net) by  
> registering at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel 
> .
>
> With Hans onboard, libusbx is already set to replace libusb on the  
> next Fedora release, and we expect other distros to follow suit, as  
> we become more and more relevant to the USB developer community.
>
> Finally, in order to concentrate fully on libusbx, I will add the  
> following related to my personal involvement with libusb, taking  
> effect immediately:
> - I am ceasing all maintenance & support activities for the Windows  
> implementation of libusb. With libusbx containing a libusbx-pbatard  
> branch (though much of its relevant content has already been merged  
> with mainline libusbx), if you are interested in Windows support and  
> development, you should head to libusbx, as this is where it's going  
> to happen.
> - I will also cease participating in libusb-devel (i.e. this list),  
> though I plan to reply to this specific thread if there are questions.
>
> With libusbx as a serious contender, we hope that the deplorable  
> libusb situation, which prompted this fork, will become a thing of  
> the past and that regardless of what libusb chooses to do (or not to  
> do), libusbx will solve all concerns you have with regards to the  
> future of the library, and in a most effective manner!
>
> Oh, if you are interested in submitting patches, please be aware  
> that libusbx will soon have Gerrit+Jenkins operational, to greatly  
> enhance the patch submission process (it's pretty much operational  
> now on a test branch [3], but still missing quite a lot of  
> finalization)
>
> Regards,
>
> /Pete
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libusbx/roadmap?show=all
> [2] https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.10/source/
> [3] http://review.libusbx.org:8080/#/q/status:open,n,z

Nice work!  :)

There's now a repo.or.cz automatic mirror of libusbx at:

gitweb: http://repo.or.cz/w/libusbx.git
clone: git://repo.or.cz/libusbx.git
graphiclog: http://repo.or.cz/git-browser/by-commit.html?r=libusbx.git


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to