On 2012.04.20 11:03, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > I will say OS X HID backend is a nice to have feature > but not absolutely necessary, could be in 1.0.13 or 2.0.
Actually, it was stated for 1.0.11 and I moved it to 1.0.12, as I don't think we'll have much time to look into it. I don't have a problem moving it further down the road. > As mentioned before, Pete will use libusbk.dll for the initial > libusb0.sys and libusbk.sys driver support. And in the future > libusbk codes will be integrated so that libusbk.dll dependency > will be dropped. That can be in 1.0.13 or 2.0. Yeah, we probably want to have something like that on the roadmap, but I am also not sure if better suited for 1.0.x or 2.0. There might be some significant effort, so 2.0 might be wise. And I want to go RERO on 2.0, so I don't think it will add much of any delay to have it in 1.0.x or 2.0. > After 1.0.11 release, I will think it is good to start hot-plug > discussions for 2.0 while targeting 1.0.12 release. How does > that sound? Sounds good to me. I'm planning to create the 2.0 branch before the 1.0.11 release, but I'd like to have gerrit finalized before that, since libusb-devel will also need to be setup there. Also, as far as I'm concerned, 1.0.11 is quite ambitious and will keep me quite busy, so there are items there, such as addressing the polluting OS-X info messages (trac #1), that I am hoping somebody else can pick up. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
