On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > On 2012.04.25 03:20, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> if you do not want to relinquish the control >> of libusb and merge back libusb/libusbx (where you will be one >> of the admin but not the sole admin) > > Please note that I will object to Peter being an admin of libusbx, even > if we have other admins to keep him in check.
Okay I respect your objection. On the other hand, right now this is a non-issue as I can see it is difficult to make the merger happen any time soon... > From also looking at his actions on the OpenOCD and coreboot mailing > lists, where he shares administrative powers, I am far from convinced > that having him onboard will do us any good: You don't oust an > estbalished dictator and install a democracy, only to reinstate the same > dictator back in a position of power. I think Peter is doing a good job in OpenOCD. I do not participate in Coreboot. > This being said, I have no issue whatsoever with Peter participating in > libusbx-devel as a regular contributor. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
