On 2012.05.11 19:11, Peter Stuge wrote: > philip.jos...@microchip.com wrote: >> We currently do this in a layer above libusb > > Can you tell us about how your users can use your layer? Ie. rough > details of the primitives and API offered?
I'd also be curious about it. On 2012.05.11 18:46, philip.jos...@microchip.com wrote: > We also retain information for any device which is unplugged > during a "session" (any time between boots or power-up) and simply > mark it as unplugged. That's how I see it as well, with your session definition being the same as mine, even at it is bound to add some complexity as a result. If one drops the refcount, devices that may be in use still need to be accessible in one way or another, so retaining data for newly disconnected devices, and just flagging them unplugged, is likely to be the way to go. Hopefully, we'll come to overhauling enum in a few months, in the libusbx devel branch, so your comments and requests will be appreciated there. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
