On 2012.07.10 12:18, Hans de Goede wrote: > one possible optimization would be to > give arm_timerfd_for_next_timeout() an extra "int stop_timer" > argument and only call disarm_timerfd() when that argument is true.
I like that idea. I'll get on to it and submit a v2 when I get a chance. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
