On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Markus <li...@neuronenwerk.de> wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> my answers became a bit longer than intended. Here's my 5 cent,
> but generally, I'd leave the decision to you:
>
>> Now, this being said, I don't have that much of an issue bumping the
>> limit, but 4K seems awfully large for a file path. Would 512 bytes
>> be OK with you?
>
> I'm perfectly ok with that.

You should use PATH_MAX from limits.h period. POSIX says it should be
there on *nix and it is also there on windows, being equal to
MAX_PATH+1 iirc. Its 4K on linux but its also what the the libc is
going to assume so you know you won't run into issues. Hardcoding
anything smaller is just asking for issues especially on sample code
that people are likely to just Copy/Paste into their projects.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to