Well, that was really a one in a billion issue (or more realistically a one in a million, as I doubt one actually gets nanosec level timer resolution during code execution, even on the fastest machine).
I have now pushed Peter's patch, amended to fix the other location where we were using a > instead of a >= (there's 2 of them). I don't think we really need the while(), but it doesn't hurt. This patch also reverts some of the extra instrumentation that was added, which should no longer be required. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
