On 2012.08.29 02:30, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > It is great that you found and confirmed the issue. I was thinking along > this line but had a quick look into the codes but was not able to find this.
Well, you certainly pointed me in the right direction. I just followed what you pointed your finger to, and there was the issue... > BTW, you are right the SF Code Browser (or even the SVN) is not that good. > You can use the libusbK Google code svn browser which is much better. > Travis will use the Google Code svn for libusbK development and only pushes to > SF at release time. > http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/trunk/libusbK/src/sys/drv_xfer_bulk.c I know (it was the first result that popped up in google when searching for the K message). But I'm not going to miss an occasion to complain about the SF 2.0 code browser... ;) > I will check with Travis. But he is busy now with some other things so > I do not expect a quick response from him right now. OK. Again, if there's no fix to be had in K for some time, we should still be able to go with a workaround in 1.0.13. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
