On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > On 2012.11.26 13:34, Toby Gray wrote: >> Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly >> even add some tests which perform some IO. My thinking for tests which >> require particular types of devices would be that they get marked as >> skipped if you don't have suitable devices connected. > > Since Xiaofan hasn't intervened yet, I'll just point out that we have an > implementation of a Benchmark device for PIC and AVR, that could come > handy for such tests [1]. This is mostly used for libusbK, but in case > you are undecided on the kind of target devices you could use for > libusbx tests, I thought I'd mention that one. > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FBmFW >
If someone could port the libusbK benchmark to libusbx, that would be great. But I can see porting is potentially difficult since it is using Windows specific thingy. So maybe a total rewrite will be easier. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
