On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > On 2013.03.07 03:34, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> The thing is that if I see the date being shift back, >> I tend to add new things. :-) > > Then I guess we need to communicate better. > > When I decide to move a date back, it's because I realistically think > that the work that's currently being lined up for it will not be > completed by the target date. Bear in mind that each item we add to the > queue requires someone actively taking time to work on it and as you > know, our resources are very limited in that respect. As a result, even > doing what looks like a simple task tends to take annoyingly much longer > than if we could just tap into a pool of developers working 9 to 5.
Noted. >> But I will still try to see if I can generate patches against libusbx.git >> based on Nathan's tree for some of the Darwin patches. > > That'd be nice. Unfortunately I do not know too much about the Darwin codes, much less than what I know about the Windows codes or the Linux codes anyway. It will be nice to a Darwin libusbx developer now that Nathan is not in libusbx. Maybe I should ask in the Apple USB mailing list to see if there are people interested. How do you like the idea? -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel