On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote:
> On 2013.03.07 03:34, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> The thing is that if I see the date being shift back,
>> I tend to add new things. :-)
>
> Then I guess we need to communicate better.
>
> When I decide to move a date back, it's because I realistically think
> that the work that's currently being lined up for it will not be
> completed by the target date. Bear in mind that each item we add to the
> queue requires someone actively taking time to work on it and as you
> know, our resources are very limited in that respect. As a result, even
> doing what looks like a simple task tends to take annoyingly much longer
> than if we could just tap into a pool of developers working 9 to 5.

Noted.

>> But I will still try to see if I can generate patches against libusbx.git
>> based on Nathan's tree for some of the Darwin patches.
>
> That'd be nice.

Unfortunately I do not know too much about the Darwin codes,
much less than what I know about the Windows codes or the
Linux codes anyway.

It will be nice to a Darwin libusbx developer now that Nathan is
not in libusbx. Maybe I should ask in the Apple USB mailing list
to see if there are people interested. How do you like the idea?

-- 
Xiaofan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to