On 2013.05.20 08:01, Hans de Goede wrote: > I'm fine with calling the next release either 1.0.16 or 1.2.0, with no > real preference.
As you may expect, I'd have a strong preference for 1.2.0. > I don't like 1.1.x because in some FOSS projects odd > minors are used for testing releases. Agreed. I too would like to leave provisions for testing, even if it's unclear whether we're actually going to use them. And yeah, since libusb has not yet defined how and where hp will be introduced, it's worth finding out which revision Nathan is leaning towards. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
