Thanks Saúl, that was what I thought. On Tuesday, 31 December 2013 09:07:37 UTC, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > > On 12/31/13 9:47 AM, David Halls wrote: > > Hi- > > > > Am I right in thinking uv__inotify_read() won't pass on IN_Q_OVERFLOW > > (linux-inotify.c) when inotify events are dropped? > > > > Hi, > > What do you mean exactly? My understanding is that it would silently > ignore the event, because the wd is set to -1 in case of IN_Q_OVERFLOW > (according to man) so find_watcher (line 152) won't find any watcher and > thus the event will be ignored. > > > Regards, > > -- > Sa�l Ibarra Corretg� > http://bettercallsaghul.com >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
