Hi!

I don't think that this would work on windows. That's probably the
main reason why it isn't in the libuv.

However, if you'll come with something cross-platform - I would
definitely review it and make everything to land it in repository.

Cheers,
Fedor.

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:32 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi. libuv doesn't seem to give a way to create anonymous or abstract sockets
> (the bind interface doesn't let one create auto abstract or autobound
> sockets (which is a Linux extension). Is there already an equivalent to the
> socketpair, pipe  and autobind sockets functionality or do I have to
> manually implement this functionality myself? Are these types of operations
> inherently unportable or has there just been no need or time to create
> equivalents for libuv? I'd assume that these types of operations would be
> the easiest way to add some types of multithreading support to libuv and
> since there are already a couple of multithreading tools in libuv these
> operations seem like a natural fit to me. If I did wrap support for these
> myself would that work be appreciated by the libuv community (I'd have to
> sign the CLA of course)?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "libuv" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"libuv" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to