I had some time to consider it and finally have one question. Should we require users to accept all incoming fds in read_cb?
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/10/2014 10:59 PM, Fedor Indutny wrote: >> >> Ben, >> >> I like your approach. That was, what I initially wanted to do. >> >> Also, I'm +1 on removing uv_read2_cb. >> >> Saghul, >> >> Are you ok with both removing read2_cb and adding two functions for >> count and types of pending handles? >> > > Definitely. Go for it! :-) > > > -- > Saúl Ibarra Corretgé > bettercallsaghul.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "libuv" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
