Got it, thanks! On Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:08:45 AM UTC-7, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > > Hi, > > On 4/17/14 8:03 PM, Susheel Aroskar wrote: > > > > Hi Saul, > > > > Thank you so much for the prompt reply! One more follow up question :) > > Is it safe to call uv_close() multiple times on the same uv_tcp_t as > > long as it is not free'd? Will the subsequent uv_close() be taken as > > NOOPs? It is admittedly bad design, but I'm afraid in some cases two > > different parts of my code can each call uv_close() on the same handle > > unaware of each other. Do I need to guard it with some "is_being_closed" > > variable or is it okay to call uv_close() multiple times? > > > > You cannot call uv_close multiple times for the same handle. You can > check if the handle is being closed with uv_is_closing (before you free > it, that is). > > > Cheers, > > -- > Saúl Ibarra Corretgé > http://bettercallsaghul.com >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
