2014-05-14 17:36 GMT+02:00 Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>: > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:30:12 PM UTC+2, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> >> >> So it will in fact close the socket right? > > > No, it doesn't need to close the socket. It is sufficient to stop polling on > it. New connections will be buffered in the kernel and delivered to the user > once they start polling on the listening socket again.
Well, that is exactly what I suggest to avoid. If I want to temporally reject new connections I prefer to really reject them at TCP level (for that the socket must be closed) rather than buffering them (which would cause pain to users). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
