Yeah, repeating timer is just an API sugar over the regular timers.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/25/2014 11:25 AM, William Ehlhardt wrote: > > On Friday, July 25, 2014 4:24:30 AM UTC-5, Fedor Indutny wrote: > > > > What if the callback execution would take 1000ms to run? Would you > > like it to just constantly spin? > > > > > > Yep. I'll deal with the consequences of that myself. > > > > There are multiple opinions about how that should go. I for one would > get rid of the timer repeat functionality and leave it on the hands of > the user so you calculate the time you want. Anyway, you can calculate > how long your callback took to execute and use uv_timer_set_repeat to > modify it, or just call uv_timer_start with the new timeout. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Saúl Ibarra Corretgé > bettercallsaghul.com > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
