2014-08-01 9:48 GMT+02:00 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]>: > UV_RUN_ONCE doesn't imply not blocking waiting for i/o, that's what > UV_RUN_NOWAIT does.
Any real use case for UV_RUN_ONCE having UV_RUN_NOWAIT? I consider UV_RUN_ONCE a bit "problematic" given, exactly, the rationale in your previous mail. This is, I consider extremely useless blocking until a TCP connection is received, and then exit. No sense IMHO. If there is no real use-cases for UV_RUN_ONCE (that cannot be achieved with UV_RUN_DEFAULT and/or UV_RUN_NOWAIT) then I suggest dropping it. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
